Relationships Between Men and Women

Gender Relationships

We often underestimate the enormous significance of human relationships and the necessity of maintaining them. Only a person with a high energy level, willing to show care and inner dedication, can build a strong family and create warm relationships with others. In contrast, an inner consumer not only fails to build relationships but also "drains" life force from another.

A woman's energy, intended for raising children, is much stronger than a man's superficial energy. A man is a strategist; his energy is more subtle, but he is externally and strategically stronger. This is why men historically were responsible for knowing the world: they went to temples and prayed, while women stayed with children. The more a man prayed, believed in the Almighty, and learned to detach from worldly things, the easier he went to death, protecting his family. If a man only worshipped his desires and sexuality, not believing in Higher Powers, he became a coward, unable to overcome his own passions and protect his family. In such a case, the family collapsed, and the children degenerated. Thus, the idea of strategic world knowledge and upbringing always belonged to the man, who strategically raised the woman and children, while the woman performed the other tasks.

When a man was faithful, had a strategically correct attitude towards the world, and was ready to die for his family and children, he had affectionate wives and many healthy children. However, as religion weakened in the world, men began to degenerate. The Western idea of worshipping consumer desires led to men losing faith and ceasing to think strategically. The strategic degeneration of men led to power shifting to women. Women began to seize power everywhere, which is a sign of civilizational collapse. This is a natural but alarming process. Diseases often originate from women with distorted energy, distorted because men stopped being faithful and fearing sin. This is a mutual process: a man fails in one area, a woman in another.

Why did men stop believing and become disillusioned with religion? Imagine a house with a foundation designed for three floors. A greedy homeowner builds five, and the whole house starts to crack. This means either two floors must be demolished, or the foundation and walls must be strengthened and developed. Similarly, the information and level of love that religion provided before the coming of Christ were exhausted. A rapidly developing civilization is exceeding our capacity to love. Our technological potential, the development of our abilities and consciousness, have far surpassed the reserves of our love and morality. This means that either we must urgently stop the development of civilization, limit it, and focus on morality and the soul, or this building will collapse. Fortunately, many who understand the inevitability of collapse are beginning to pause, think less about business, affairs, and career, and more about the soul. This trend is observed worldwide, and it's normal.

If a man stops caring for his soul, a woman must "destroy" him with her energy, just as a negligent educator suffers from a poorly raised student. This is a normal production process. For children to be born healthy, they must have kind and loving mothers. But for such women to exist, there must be a man who believes in Higher Powers and is ready to die for love and his family. We will certainly return to this and achieve it. If we don't, there will be no men, no women, and no children.

A woman can very easily "break through" her husband: it's enough for her to think ill of him, and he begins to "fall apart." If a man cares too much for a woman, flatters her, fears offending her in a relationship, constantly gives compliments, and so on, he makes her increasingly jealous. He ties her to relationships, to sexuality, to certain moments in such a way that when she begins to "destroy" him with this same jealousy, he cannot and should not defend himself. We are responsible for those we corrupt.

Therefore, if a man spoils a woman by reinforcing her attachments with excessive care, stability, without allowing her to experience any imbalance, then the more he panders to her desires, the more she will hate him, the more strongly she will "break him down," and he will fall ill and die.

The same scheme applies to a child. If we raise them with a slight distortion, attaching them to something (principles, well-being, or desires), then we will pay for it. Consequently, proper child-rearing is harmonious upbringing, which primarily involves putting the soul and worldview in order, and then everything else.

The fact is that there must be two poles in a family: one – kindness, warmth, positive emotions, and the other – negative emotions. Only when both poles are present does a child develop in harmony.

In an incomplete family where the woman is alone, she is forced to play the role of both parents. Since kindness and affection aren't always enough to raise a child, she mostly becomes a "Cerberus" and fulfills the man's role. It's harder for her to combine both mother and father roles, with the mother's role increasingly receding into the background, leading to a situation similar to an orphanage.

Why do children from incomplete families, meaning from orphanages or raised by single mothers, have problems? A child must develop correctly. To know the Divine, they must experience love. For this, two poles are necessary: love and warmth, as well as punishment and strictness.

In an orphanage, there is only strictness and punishment. In such conditions, children need to be given religion so that by turning to the Almighty on the subtle plane, they receive love. When they receive only punishment, it leads to catastrophe. Punishment without love kills love. Graduates of orphanages are 60% criminals, 35% suicides, drug addicts, and so on. Such is the statistics.

There must be a male and female principle. The father is strict and just, who debases the human. And the mother is kind, forgiving, and supportive, who strengthens. If the mother behaves like the father, the child will be inhibited, self-conscious, unhappy, and sick. If the father behaves like the mother, indulging the child's desires, he will be a spiritual invalid, a scoundrel, a villain who will trample on everyone. That is why problems arise in children in incomplete families. For the father and mother to create male and female principles and faith in Higher Powers in the family, they must give the energy of love and simultaneously debase the human. This is what happens with a child with proper parental relationships. However, since the mother is still positive emotions and energy giving, and the father is a tougher and stricter principle, the child subconsciously gravitates more to the mother, depends on her more, and her energy, accordingly, affects the child more strongly.

A single mother is forced to fulfill both male and female roles, and she must by no means mix them. As soon as she mixes them, the child will "fall apart" because they will stop seeing anything in their mother. Therefore, one must clearly play the role of the father and not mix it with the role of the mother, while teaching the child to believe in the Primordial, in Higher Altruism. Then the child will endure and accept this alternating play of roles and will be raised normally.

You don't suspect how strong a woman's energy is. She has to bear children, she has to raise them. Therefore, a woman's energy capacity is higher, and that's why she easily "kills" a man. Because of this, men often become weak, alcoholic, in order to debase, reduce a woman's attachment to the material, and thus reduce her aggression. It turns out that if she lets go of her attachment to ideals, tomorrow he simply becomes a hero. But as long as she thinks: "What a scoundrel, what a guy... What a superwoman I am, and what kind of man is he," then he, to survive, will be a "doormat."

If the man is a "doormat" and the woman is a "man," then he should love and caress the children, and the mother should "scare" them. A man is not physiology; he is a function. If a man has no need to protect, risk his life, and so on, if a woman herself begins to take on this function, then the man is easily corrupted and spoiled. Therefore, when a woman says: "Well, he doesn't want to work, but I'm slaving away," well! Then you also start to imitate a weak woman. Say that there's no money now. Save money so he doesn't know. Make stashes, after all. Let him fuss. That is, you need to raise him like a child. Perhaps if the man is a "doormat," his wife is to blame. At the same time, when she looks at him and says: "Ugh, what a mess," he stays alive. Because his state humiliates his wife's attachment to ideals and, strangely enough, thereby reduces her aggression. A man just wants to survive.

Why does the Bible say: "Let the wife fear her husband"? This means that a woman should respect her husband, no matter what happens. What does this give? No matter how unjust he is, how much he offends, she must maintain love and respect, and then the "cleansing" that comes through the husband will lead to healthy children. If the woman cannot withstand this "cleansing" and begins to condemn her husband, then condemning her husband is, on a subconscious level, condemning the father and the Creator. Because there is a plan where all men are connected to each other; the Primordial for some reason is not modeled through the female principle, although in the highest aspect, the main Papa and Mama have absolutely all hypostases.

A woman who, during pregnancy, could not restrain herself from criticizing her husband, gives birth to a child with devilish inclinations, very cruel. Because the highest cruelty comes from attachments to higher planes, spirituality, ideals. She gives birth to a child with possible schizophrenia, autism, a disability... anything. This is an elementary mechanism. And the Bible has only one line: "Let the wife fear her husband."

On the other hand, there has always been a concept of noble attitude towards women in humanity, and to insult or humiliate a woman is one of the greatest crimes for a normal man. Why should there be a respectful and condescending attitude towards women? Because any "cleansing" comes through the opposite sex. No one can cause greater offense and pain than a woman. Therefore, the greatest "cleansing" can come through a woman. If a man is properly raised in a code of honor, he can accept the pain from a woman, and then he will save his soul, put it in order, and he will have healthy children. The absence of morality is the destruction of other people.

Since a woman gives birth, she should focus more on feelings, while a man should focus on spirituality and thought. The more educated a woman is, the more she thinks, and the more spiritual she is, the less chance she has of giving birth to a healthy child. Because it is harder for her to accept the collapse of the future. Therefore, in life, situations have always forced a woman to be pragmatic, to be a realist, so to speak, to extricate herself from various situations and not cling to principles or violate them for the sake of survival, for life, and so on. And there is a certain reason in this.

A leader, a "presser," is always a male principle. So, when a woman takes on the functions of a man, becomes a leader, goes into spirituality, her subtle plane energy is reborn, and her male principle begins. She stops giving birth. She doesn't have children. She starts to "press" everyone. She becomes tough and so on. That is, she performs the functions of a leader. The man is the external leader, the woman is the emotional and internal leader. There is a division of leadership. And external leadership, aggression, suppression - this is a purely male topic. As soon as a woman goes down this path, starts doing business, then it's over. Now any woman in the West will "shake down" any man according to their laws. So where are normal men supposed to come from then?

A woman does not necessarily have to yield to her husband in everything and suppress herself. A woman can and should be selfish, capricious, demand that her husband take care of her, give her money, and so on. This is normal. That is, the energy of desires should not be suppressed, but care for one's animal nature should be restrained. In the case of a complete rejection of one's animal nature, self-destruction will occur.

A man who interacts with a woman should ignite beautiful feelings for her, and then transformation occurs. If a man does not give flowers, does not give compliments, but on the contrary, suppresses this high feeling and reduces it only to the sexual, a block occurs in his navel area. And the higher his sexual energy, the more strongly he is "torn apart." Then he becomes either an aggressor or impotent, as inner strength must fall for survival.

If everything comes down purely to the sexual act, then children also suffer. For example, with a prostitute, with whom there is basically nothing to talk about, the energy is poorly transformed and goes into the animal nature. Since subtle planes are not formed, and they are necessary for the formation of children's souls, their feelings and destiny, the energetic background and capabilities of a prostitute's children are reduced. The Bible says: "The children of a harlot are cursed to the ninth generation."

How does a man react to a woman? He gives feeling, scans the woman, and receives a reflection of his feelings back. A man gives energy in three positions: animal, human, and divine. He sent it to her, and only the animal returns. And this return of animal energy from the woman determines the man's attitude towards her. How is an aristocrat defined? By how she is treated. Therefore, strangely enough, a woman who is raped, she herself programs everyone so that they react only to her animal nature. And this is violence. He wants to lay her down, and she refuses, and the mechanism of elementary animal relationships is triggered, where the male mounts the female.

Informational aspects precede material ones – this is the field genotype. No woman ever gives birth from one man, even if she is completely faithful to him. Because any of her infatuations is already an informational imprint of another person in her energy plasma, and there is nothing terrible about this. The development of the Divine is always opposites. Therefore, on the one hand, a woman in love receives an influx of new information through relationships, which she still needs to filter. On the other hand, if a woman "throws herself" at every man, the field of the future child is disturbed.

For example, a young husband and wife, where the energy of the future child is forming. They haven't had children yet. At this moment, she becomes infatuated with another, and this other, on a subtle plane, unconsciously begins to "kill" the competitor — the future child. Its destruction occurs. It turns out that marital infidelity before the conception of children can lead to the appearance of sick children. However, if a woman falls madly in love with a man, if her worship is very strong, then if she doesn't look at anyone else, if she doesn't develop even a sexual attraction to another, then complete obsession with her husband will lead to the death of the child. And infidelity and flirting arise when there is inner disharmony. Therefore, for a religious person, for a person who has removed dependence on everything, a normal relationship will be one partner, love for him.

First, we become fixated on a loved one, start to be jealous and hate, and then something pushes us to infidelity because we cannot bear the feeling of jealousy. So, the first link is obsession with a loved one. At the same time, demanding from another what we demand from a healthy person is a big mistake.

If a woman has a great concentration on a prosperous fate, then if her husband makes her happy, he will "kill" her soul, her children, and himself. Therefore, a man must be poor next to such a woman. That is, if a woman cannot accept the loss of money, cannot accept humiliation or straitened living conditions, and is constantly dissatisfied with fate, saying she's being scolded, then her husband has no right to be rich, her son should not want to work. The scheme is very simple. The more we resent fate, the less people around us have the right to be happy, to have stability, and so on.

So, raising another person is always love and pain. Without pain, there are no changes. If we shy away from pain, then we simply won't be able to raise another person or ourselves anymore. Observe yourself in a normal situation. If you are unable to be sincere in your feelings, not necessarily in words, then you already have problems.