Relationships Between Man and Woman

Interrelationships of Genders

We often underestimate the enormous significance of human relationships and the necessity of maintaining them. Only a person with a high energy level, ready to show care and inner dedication, can build a strong family and foster warm relationships with others. Conversely, an inner consumer not only fails to build relationships but also "drains" the life force from others.

A woman's energy, designed for raising children, is much stronger than a man's superficial energy. A man is a strategist; his energy is more subtle, but he is externally and strategically stronger. This is why men historically were responsible for exploring the world: they went to the temple and prayed, while women stayed with the children. The more a man prayed, believed in the Almighty, and learned to detach from worldly matters, the more easily he would face death to protect his family. If a man only worshipped his desires and sexuality, without believing in Higher Powers, he became a coward, unable to overcome his own passions and protect his family. In such cases, the family disintegrated, and the children degenerated. Thus, the idea of strategic world knowledge and upbringing always belonged to the man, who strategically raised the woman and children, while the woman handled the remaining tasks.

When a man was a believer, related strategically correctly to the world, and was ready to die for his family and children, then he had affectionate wives and many healthy children. However, as religion weakened in the world, men began to degenerate. The Western idea of worshipping consumer desires led to men losing faith in religion and ceasing to think strategically. The strategic degeneration of men led to power shifting to women. Women began to seize power everywhere, which is a sign of civilizational collapse. This is a natural, yet alarming, process. Illnesses often stem from women with distorted energy, distorted because the man ceased to be a believer and to fear sin. This is a reciprocal process: the man fails in one aspect, the woman in another.

Why did man stop believing and become disillusioned with religion? Imagine the natural development of a house with a foundation designed for three floors. A greedy builder adds five, and the whole house begins to crack. This means you either need to tear down two floors or strengthen and develop the foundation and walls. Similarly, the information and level of love that religion provided before the coming of Christ have been exhausted. A rapidly developing civilization is exceeding the limits of our capacity to love. Our technical potential, the development of abilities and consciousness, has far surpassed the reserves of our love and morality. This means we must either urgently stop the development of civilization, limit it, and focus on morality and the soul, or this building will collapse. Fortunately, many who recognize the impending collapse are beginning to slow down, thinking less about business, affairs, and career, and more about their soul. This trend is present worldwide, and it's normal.

If a man ceases to care for his soul, then the woman must "kill" him with her energy, just as an irresponsible educator must suffer from their ill-disciplined student. This is a normal production process. For children to be born and be healthy, they must have kind and loving mothers. But for such women to exist, there must be a man who believes in Higher Powers and is ready to die for love and for his family. We will return to this and achieve it. If we don't, there will be no men, no women, no children.

A woman can very easily "pierce" her husband: it's enough for her to think poorly of him, and he starts to "fall apart." If a man cares too much for a woman, flatters her, is afraid of offending her in relationships, constantly compliments her, and so on, he makes her increasingly jealous. He attaches her to relationships, to sexuality, to certain moments in such a way that when she begins to "kill" him with that very jealousy, he cannot and should not defend himself. We are responsible for those we corrupt.

Therefore, if he himself spoils her, if he strengthens attachments by excessively caring for her, providing stability, and not allowing her to experience any imbalance, then the more he indulges her desires, the more she will hate him, the more strongly she will "pierce" him, and he will fall ill and die.

The same scheme applies to a child. If we raise a child with a slight distortion, attaching them to something (principles, well-being, or desires), then we will pay for it. Therefore, proper child-rearing is harmonious upbringing – it is primarily about bringing the soul and worldview into order, and then everything else.

The fact is, there should be two poles in a family. One pole is goodwill, warmth, positive emotion. And at the second pole are negative emotions. And only when there are two poles, then the child is in harmony.

In an incomplete family, where a woman is alone, she is forced to take on both parental roles. Since kindness and affection aren't always enough for upbringing, she mostly becomes a "Cerberus" and fulfills the role of a man. It's harder for her to combine both the roles of mother and father, with the mother's role increasingly receding into the background, leading to a situation similar to an orphanage.

Why do children from incomplete families, i.e., from orphanages or raised by single mothers, have problems? A child must develop correctly. To comprehend the Divine, they must experience love. For this, two poles are necessary: love and warmth, as well as punishment and strictness.

In an orphanage, there's only strictness and punishment. In principle, children there should be given religion. Then, by turning to the Almighty on a subtle plane, they would receive love. But when they receive only punishment – that's it. That's a catastrophe. Punishment without love kills love. 60% of orphanage graduates become criminals, 35% are suicides, drug addicts, and so on. That's the statistics.

The masculine and feminine principles must be present. The father is strict and just, who humbles the human. And the mother is kind, forgiving, and supportive, who strengthens. If the mother behaves like the father, the child will be inhibited, self-conscious, unhappy, and will fall ill. If the father behaves like the mother, indulging the child's desires, being permissive, – this will result in a spiritual invalid, a scoundrel, a villain, who will trample on everyone and everything. That is why children in incomplete families have problems. For a father and mother to create masculine and feminine principles and faith in Higher Powers in the family, they must give the energy of love and simultaneously humble the human. This is what happens with a child in a competent parent-child relationship. However, since the mother is nevertheless positive emotions, the mother is the giving of energy, and the father is a more rigid and strict principle, the child subconsciously gravitates more towards the mother, depends on her more, and her energy, accordingly, influences the child more strongly.

A single mother is forced to perform both male and female roles, and she must by no means mix them. As soon as she mixes them, the child will "collapse" because they will cease to see anything in the mother. Therefore, one must clearly play the father's role and not mix it with the mother's role, while teaching the child to believe in the Original, in Higher Altruism. Then the child will endure and accept this alternating role-play and will be raised normally.

You have no idea how strong a woman's energy is. She must bear children. She must raise them. Therefore, a woman's energy capacity is higher, and that's why she easily "kills" a man. Because of this, men often become weak and prone to drinking, to humble, to reduce a woman's attachment to the material, and thus lessen her aggression. It turns out that if she releases the attachment to ideals, tomorrow he simply becomes a hero. But as long as she thinks, "What a scoundrel, what a... What a superwoman I am, and what kind of man is he," then he, to survive, will be a "rag."

If a man is a "rag" and a woman is a "man," then he should love and caress the children, and the mother should "scare" them. A man is not a physiology – it's a function. If a man has no need to protect, risk his life, and so on, if the woman herself begins to take on this function, then it is easy to corrupt and spoil the man. Therefore, when a woman says, "Well, he doesn't want to work, and I'm toiling," well! Then you too start to imitate a weak woman. Say that there's no money right now. Put money aside without him knowing. Make stashes, after all. Let him hustle. That is, you need to educate him like a child. Perhaps, if the man is a "rag," his wife is to blame. At the same time, when she looks at him and says, "Ugh, what a mess," he stays alive. Because his state humbles his wife's attachment to ideals and, strangely enough, reduces her aggression. The man simply wants to survive.

Why does the Bible say, "Let the wife fear her husband"? This means a woman should respect her husband no matter what happens. What does this achieve? No matter how unjust he was, no matter how he offended her, she must preserve love and respect, and then the "cleansing" that comes through the husband will lead to healthy children. If, however, the woman cannot endure this "cleansing" and begins to condemn her husband, then the condemnation of the husband is, on a subconscious level, the condemnation of the father and the Creator. Because there is a plane where all men are connected to each other; the Original is for some reason not modeled through the feminine principle, although in the highest aspect, the main Father and Mother possess absolutely all hypostases.

A woman who, during pregnancy, could not refrain from criticizing her husband, gives birth to a child with devilish inclinations, a very cruel one. Because the highest cruelty stems from attachments to higher planes, spirituality, and ideals. She gives birth to a child with possible schizophrenia, autism, a disability... anything. It's an elementary mechanism. And in the Bible, there's only one line: "Let the wife fear her husband."

On the other hand, humanity has always held the concept of noble treatment of women, and to insult or humiliate a woman is one of the greatest crimes for a normal man. Why should there be a respectful and lenient attitude towards women? Because any "cleansing" happens through the other gender. No one can inflict greater offense and pain than a woman. Therefore, the greatest "cleansing" can come through a woman. If a man is properly educated in a code of honor, then he can accept the pain from a woman, and then he will save his soul, bring it into order, and have healthy children. The absence of morality is the destruction of other people.

Since a woman gives birth, she should focus more on feelings. And a man on spirituality and thought. And the more educated a woman is, the more she thinks, and the more spiritual she is, the less chance she has of giving birth to a healthy child. Because it is harder for her to accept the collapse of the future. Therefore, in life, situations have always forced a woman to be pragmatic, to be a realist, so to speak, to extricate herself from various situations and not cling to principles or violate them for the sake of survival, life, and so on. And there is a certain logic in this.

Always the leader, the "pressurer"—that's the masculine principle. So, when a woman takes on the functions of a man, becomes a leader, goes into spirituality, her subtle energy regenerates, and her masculine principle begins. She stops giving birth. She doesn't have children. She starts "pressuring" everyone. She becomes rigid and so on. That is, she performs the functions of a leader. A man is the external leader; a woman is the emotional and internal leader. A division of leadership occurs. And external leadership, aggression, suppression—that's a purely masculine theme. As soon as a woman goes down this path, starts doing business, then—finito. Now, any woman in the West will "shake down" any man according to their laws. So where then are normal men to come from?

A woman doesn't have to give in to her husband in everything and suppress herself. A woman can and should be selfish, capricious, demand that her husband take care of her, give her money, and so on. This is normal. That is, the energy of desires should not be suppressed, but the care for one's animalistic nature should be restrained. In the case of a complete rejection of one's animalistic nature, self-destruction will occur.

A man who interacts with a woman should ignite beautiful feelings for her, and then transformation occurs. If a man doesn't give flowers, doesn't pay compliments, but instead suppresses this high feeling and reduces it only to the sexual, a block arises in his navel area. And the higher his sexual energy, the more he is "torn apart." Then he becomes either a rapist or impotent, as inner strength must decrease to survive.

If everything is reduced purely to the sexual act, children also suffer. For example, with a prostitute, with whom there is basically nothing to talk about, the energy is minimally transformed and directed towards the animalistic. Since the subtle planes are not formed, and these are necessary for the formation of children's souls, their feelings, and their destiny, the energetic background and opportunities of a prostitute's children are diminished. The Bible states: "The children of a harlot are cursed to the ninth generation."

How does a man react to a woman? He gives a feeling, scans the woman, and receives a reflection of his feelings back. A man gives energy in three positions: animal, human, and divine. He sent it to her, and only the animal returns. And this return of animal energy from the woman determines the man's attitude toward her. How is an aristocrat defined? By how she is treated. Therefore, strangely enough, a woman who is raped, she herself programs everyone, as if only reacting to the animalistic principle. And this is violence. He wants to lay her down, but she refuses, and the mechanism of elementary animal relations is triggered, where the male mounts the female.

Informational aspects precede material ones — this is the field genotype. No woman ever conceives children from a single man, even if she is completely faithful to him. Because any of her infatuations is already an informational imprint of another person in her energy-plasma, and there is nothing terrible in that. The development of the Divine always involves opposites. Therefore, on the one hand, a woman in a state of infatuation receives a fresh influx of new information through relationships, which she must still manage to filter. On the other hand, if a woman "throws herself" at every man, a disruption of the future child's field occurs.

Let's say a young husband and wife are forming the energy of their future child. They haven't had children yet. At this moment, she becomes infatuated with another, and this other, on a subtle plane, unconsciously begins to "kill" the competitor—the future child. Its destruction occurs. It turns out that marital infidelity before conception can lead to the birth of sick children. However, if a woman falls madly in love with a man, if her worship is very strong, then, so to speak, if she doesn't look at anyone else, if she doesn't feel at least a sexual attraction to another, then a complete fixation on her husband will lead to the child's death. Both infidelity and flirting occur when there is an inner disharmony. Therefore, for a believer, for a person who has freed themselves from all dependencies, a normal relationship will involve one partner, and love for them.

First, we become fixated on a loved one, start to feel jealous and hate, and then something pushes us to infidelity because we cannot endure the feeling of jealousy. So the first link is fixation on a loved one. At the same time, demanding from another what we demand from a healthy person is a big mistake.

If a woman has a high concentration on a prosperous destiny, then if her husband makes her happy, he will "kill" her soul, her children, and himself. Therefore, a man must be poor next to such a woman. That is, if a woman cannot accept the loss of money, cannot accept humiliation or constrained living conditions, and is constantly dissatisfied with her fate, complaining that she is being criticized, then her husband has no right to be rich, her son should not want to work. The scheme is very simple. The more we resent fate, the less right people around us have to be happy, to have stability, and so on.

So, the upbringing of another person is always about love and pain. There is no change without pain. If we avoid pain, we simply won't be able to educate another person or ourselves. Observe yourself in an ordinary situation. If you are unable to be sincere in your feelings – not necessarily in words – then you already have problems.